Another testing was done so that we could compare the results to our first test and see how similar or different the results were and why. Testing#2 efficiency was lower at 76% compared to testing#1 which had the efficiency of 85%, one reason that this probably happened is because testing#1 had a shorter period of time recorded in comparison of testing#2. Our thermos was completed and all final adjustments were made the day before, thus today was just a work period on completing our research. Heat v.s. time graph was made, and the analysis was getting done.
No comments:
Post a Comment